I like the source one. Responsive is much easier to use.
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Laura,
>
> Interesting, it also occurs to me that with better, more widespread tools
> in education more people will be coming through the system expecting things
> to be accessible, which is good.
>
> Sidenote: I think the original is here: http://www.anglia.ac.uk/news/
> cases-of-blindness-to-rise-to-115-million-by-2050
>
> Comparing the two layouts, the first has a text-size control but is not
> responsive. The source one is responsive.
> Which do people prefer?
>
> -Alastair
>
>
> On 07/08/2017, 13:40, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> fyi:
>
> Number of people with vision disabilities to triple by 2050: Study
> http://globalaccessibilitynews.com/2017/08/07/number-of-people-
> with-vision-disabilities-to-triple-by-2050-study/
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Laura
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>
>
>
>
--
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964