public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org from April 2017 by date

Sunday, 30 April 2017

• Taking Two Weeks Off W3C Wayne Dick

Saturday, 29 April 2017

• Experiment Design Wayne Dick

Friday, 28 April 2017

• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Wayne Dick
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Wayne Dick
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Laura Carlson
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Alastair Campbell
• Re: How do we distinguish between I, l and 1 and 0 and O? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Jim Allan
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Wayne Dick
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Jim Allan
• RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Jonathan Avila
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Wayne Dick
• Re: How do we distinguish between I, l and 1 and 0 and O? Wayne Dick

Thursday, 27 April 2017

• RE: How do we distinguish between I, l and 1 and 0 and O? Jonathan Avila
• Re: How do we distinguish between I, l and 1 and 0 and O? Jim Allan
• Minutes: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon Jim Allan
• How do we distinguish between I, l and 1 and 0 and O? Wayne Dick
• Wordsmithing of Issue #10 User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) Glenda Sims
• ISSUE-2: Need to think about things which are programmatically available but not visible (popups, icon fonts, background images, sprites). may need an sc. Low Vision Accessibility Task Force Issue Tracker
• lvtf-ACTION-98: Create definition of spatial layout for text resize Low Vision Accessibility Task Force Issue Tracker
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson
• RE: Resize content responses (was agenda for telco) Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon Erich Manser
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Resize content responses (was agenda for telco) Alastair Campbell
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Greg Lowney
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Hakkinen, Mark T
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon Repsher, Stephen J

Wednesday, 26 April 2017

• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? David MacDonald
• Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon Alastair Campbell
• Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon Jim Allan
• Re: Where should we handle Table Borders and Details/Summary "triangle" Jim Allan
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Jonathan Avila
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Greg Lowney
• RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Jonathan Avila
• RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Repsher, Stephen J
• Quick update on table borders and other visual affordances related to User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) Glenda Sims
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Laura Carlson
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Wayne Dick
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Laura Carlson
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Jonathan Avila
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Laura Carlson
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Gregg C Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 25 April 2017

• RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Using Markdown for Github accessibility Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Laura Carlson
• Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Laura Carlson
• Re: Using Markdown for Github accessibility David MacDonald
• RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? Repsher, Stephen J
• Using Markdown for Github accessibility Wayne Dick
• RE: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Jonathan Avila
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell
• Should we drop the color bullet for now? Laura Carlson
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell

Monday, 24 April 2017

• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: updated Personalization settings WIKI page Jim Allan
• updated Personalization settings WIKI page Jim Allan
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• reminder call today ----Re: Joint call - Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Low Vision Task Force on personalization - Monday, April 24, 2017 lisa.seeman
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell

Sunday, 23 April 2017

• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Michael Pluke
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• RE: Where should we handle Table Borders and Details/Summary "triangle" Jonathan Avila

Friday, 21 April 2017

• Re: Can you add table borders to TRx? Glenda Sims
• Re: Can you add table borders to TRx? Laura Carlson
• Can you add table borders to TRx? Glenda Sims
• Re: Where should we handle Table Borders and Details/Summary "triangle" Alastair Campbell

Thursday, 20 April 2017

• Re: Media control contrast Glenda Sims
• Re: Media control contrast Jim Allan
• Re: Media control contrast Glenda Sims
• Media control contrast Jim Allan
• Joint call - Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Low Vision Task Force on personalization - Monday, April 24, 2017 lisa.seeman
• Where should we handle Table Borders and Details/Summary "triangle" Glenda Sims
• LVTF Meeting Minutes - April 20, 2017 Erich Manser

Wednesday, 19 April 2017

• A measure of element growth due to changing font family. Wayne Dick
• Re: Joint Call on Monday 24 April Jim Allan
• Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 20 April 2017 telecon Jim Allan
• To LVTF -- Re: open issues and things to edit Jim Allan

Monday, 17 April 2017

• Re: Please complete this week's AG WG surveys Laura Carlson
• Re: Please complete this week's AG WG surveys Laura Carlson
• Please complete this week's AG WG surveys Laura Carlson
• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Gregg C Vanderheiden

Sunday, 16 April 2017

• Re: [public-low-vision-a11y-tf] <none> Alastair Campbell

Saturday, 15 April 2017

• [public-low-vision-a11y-tf] <none> Wayne Dick

Thursday, 13 April 2017

• LVTF Meeting Minutes 4/13/17 Erich Manser
• lvtf-ACTION-97: Will schedule time for tpac Low Vision Accessibility Task Force Issue Tracker
• Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 13 April 2017 telecon Wayne Dick

Wednesday, 12 April 2017

• Availability to attend teleconferences updated Jim Allan
• Re: User Interface Contrast Ratio Thresholds - sandbox Marla Runyan

Tuesday, 11 April 2017

• Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 13 April 2017 telecon Jim Allan
• Re: Lets Change Meta Data Back, and Put it on the agenda Jim Allan
• Lets Change Meta Data Back, and Put it on the agenda Wayne Dick
• Re: User Interface Contrast Ratio Thresholds - sandbox Jim Allan
• Re: Adapting text question on this week's survey Laura Carlson
• RE: Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? Rochford, John

Monday, 10 April 2017

• Re: Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? Laura Carlson
• Re: Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? Erich Manser
• Re: New Proposed Wording for Issue #10 User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) Jim Allan
• Re: Adapting text question on this week's survey Laura Carlson
• RE: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC Jonathan Avila
• Re: Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? Jim Allan
• Re: Please complete this week's AG WG survey Laura Carlson
• RE: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Jonathan Avila
• Re: Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? Glenda Sims
• Technolog Agnostic / Independent Wayne Dick
• Re: Please complete this week's AG WG survey Laura Carlson
• Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? Wayne Dick
• Re: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC Laura Carlson
• Re: Please complete this week's AG WG survey Wayne Dick
• Re: User Interface Contrast Ratio Thresholds - sandbox Wayne Dick
• Re: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC Wayne Dick
• Re: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC Laura Carlson

Sunday, 9 April 2017

• User Interface Contrast Ratio Thresholds - sandbox Marla Runyan
• Please complete this week's AG WG survey Laura Carlson

Saturday, 8 April 2017

• Re: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC Erich Manser
• Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC Marla Runyan

Friday, 7 April 2017

• RE: Setting a more visible focus indicator Repsher, Stephen J

Thursday, 6 April 2017

• New Proposed Wording for Issue #10 User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) Glenda Sims
• RE: Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: quick question...answer in 2 hours Erich Manser
• RE: quick question...answer in 2 hours Repsher, Stephen J
• quick question...answer in 2 hours Jim Allan
• LVTF Meeting Minutes - 4/6/2017 Erich Manser
• Re: Special fonts don't matter for font-family change. Wayne Dick
• RE: Special fonts don't matter for font-family change. Jonathan Avila
• Re: Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues Laura Carlson
• Re: Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues Gregg C Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 5 April 2017

• Re: Special fonts don't matter for font-family change. Alastair Campbell
• Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues Laura Carlson
• Re: Popup SC #75 remove Laura Carlson
• Special fonts don't matter for font-family change. Wayne Dick
• Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 6 Apr 2017 Telecon Jim Allan
• Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 6 Apr 2017 Telecon Marla Runyan
• Re: Popup SC #75 remove Marla Runyan

Tuesday, 4 April 2017

• RE: Testing Consensus on GitHub: Adapting Text Proposal D was (Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text ) Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Testing Consensus on GitHub: Adapting Text Proposal D was (Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text ) Jim Allan
• Testing Consensus on GitHub: Adapting Text Proposal D was (Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text ) Laura Carlson
• Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 6 Apr 2017 Telecon Jim Allan
• Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text Laura Carlson
• Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text Laura Carlson
• Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text Jim Allan
• Subtle change to Adapting Text Repsher, Stephen J
• Joint COGA & LVTF telecon - Personalization Jim Allan
• Interesting article on color Jim Allan

Monday, 3 April 2017

• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal David MacDonald
• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal David MacDonald
• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal Gregg C Vanderheiden

Sunday, 2 April 2017

• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal Wayne Dick
• Please consider completing this week's AG WG survey Laura Carlson

Saturday, 1 April 2017

• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal David MacDonald
• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Color Test: A formal proposal Wayne Dick

Last message date: Sunday, 30 April 2017 16:40:29 UTC