Re: 1100% enlargement from Laura Carlson on 2016-07-11 (public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org from July 2016)

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:36:07 -0500
To: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAOavpve+M9shjsaVj4a0m5Z-5uMXLqMMO1ESeuH=azfU1n-AAQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Wayne,

Thanks for the example.

Were you able to find the specific reference to Gordon Legge's study
that cited 1100 percent?

Kindest regards,
Laura

On 7/10/16, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote:
> The size 1100% seems crazy o first glance, but it is very practical for
> reading. I first thought of getting all logical, but an example is better.
> Look at WCAG 1.4.8 Issue #5.  I have included a screen shot of 1100%
> enlargement of 16px on a 22 inch screen. It looks like a reasonable reading
> interface to me.
>
> Take a look. https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-SC/issues/5
>
> Wayne
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 18:36:47 UTC