comments on survey -- 'Review Requirements document'

Hi all,

A couple comments on <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/81151/UserNeeds-Jan-27/results>

Wayne Dick:
> This is a good title and idea. The problem is that the note is so condensed
> that it contributes little new to justify our user needs. All of the unique
> insight has been removed. The current document does not justify its
> conclusions. If the Cog report was too long, this is equally too short.
</end Wayne comment>

I agree that the draft Note doesn't quite find the right balance yet.

Another model to look at is the Media Accessibility User Requirements <https://www.w3.org/TR/media-accessibility-reqs/>

---

Jim Allan:
we seem to have lost "A person using high contrast mode (HCM) which inverts colors is trying to view shared images of friends on social media but losing content & context because photographic images are also displayed with inverted colors. [Erich, UC-2] "
perhaps
User Need - Color. When selecting HCM users can choose HCM for text only, or images only, or both text and images.
</end Jim comment>

Don't worry; it's not lost. :) It's listed as an open issue here <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/User_stories_-_use_cases> and pointed to from here <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/LVTF_Open_Issues>

I think that might be too specific of a user need. Maybe this becomes an example in a broader user need.

All for now,
~Shawn

Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2016 12:14:35 UTC