- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:21:30 -0700
- To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Cc: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, Low Vision Accessibility Task Force <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SD1qZ20MChPWKbwe12hgUWLjTgNNRjgdWdFs1Dk9DU2Rw@mail.gmail.com>
What about this wording for a need: Users with low vision require sufficient contrast to be able to distinguish the borders of form controls and regions of content that authors call out by providing borders. Borders should have contrast rations equal to or greater than the minimum contrast ratio for text on the page. This applies to all form controls including radio buttons and check boxes. Does this do it? On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> wrote: > Ø That said, I think this is a major issue to be added to WCAG. Minimum > contrast (WCAG 1.4.3) should apply to more than only text and images of > text content. It should apply to form controls and other elements with > borders. > > > > I agree and I have two comments. > > > > 1. After talking with some designers I was told that they need clear > recommendations on this with specific numbers and rationale in order to > implement such as design change – just indicating it is helpful to users > isn’t enough. From what I found the size of the control may make a > difference – that is the border on a checkbox may be more important than > the border on an input field due to the size of the control. Would we > consider less contrast for larger size controls like SC 1.4.3 does for text? > > 2. Some sites such as goFundMe.com have input fields with no borders > on the inputs. We might want to consider whether we see this as an issue. > To see the issue go to gofundme and then select a person to donate to and > click the donate button. This is a very unfortunate design decision in my > opinion. > > 3. We might also consider what happens to borders when a user is in > high contrast mode. > > > > Jonathan > > > > Jonathan Avila > > Chief Accessibility Officer > > SSB BART Group > > jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com > > 703.637.8957 (Office) > > > > Visit us online: Website <http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/> | Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SSBBARTGroup> | Facebook > <https://www.facebook.com/ssbbartgroup> | Linkedin > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/355266?trk=tyah> | Blog > <http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/blog/> > > Check out our Digital Accessibility Webinars! > <http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/webinars/> > > > > *From:* Jim Allan [mailto:jimallan@tsbvi.edu] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 20, 2016 1:28 PM > *To:* Low Vision Accessibility Task Force > *Subject:* Re: lvtf-ACTION-51: Write user need on "non-text contrast" - > [can change the name, border, grids, etc] > > > > Note: 3.5.1 Element-level customization talks about borders and colors. > perhaps we can expand the explanatory text to illustrate the need to change > "non-text contrast". > > That said, I think this is a major issue to be added to WCAG. Minimum > contrast (WCAG 1.4.3) should apply to more than only text and images of > text content. It should apply to form controls and other elements with > borders. > > Jim > > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Low Vision Accessibility Task Force > Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > lvtf-ACTION-51: Write user need on "non-text contrast" - [can change the > name, border, grids, etc] > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/track/actions/51 > > Assigned to: Wayne Dick > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator > > Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired > 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 > voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ > > "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964 >
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2016 07:22:38 UTC