Re: Closing your Community Group?

On Tue, 03 May 2016 21:26:07 +0200, Enayat Rajabi <enayatrajabi@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> Dear Coralie,
>
> Merging the community to another group like OpenEd
> <https://www.w3.org/community/opened/> would be an option. Give me some
> time to communicate with the OpenEd chair, then I will come back to you.

That works for me. Thanks, Enayat.

Cheers,
Coralie

> ​Regards,
> Enayat​
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Jason, Enayat,
>>
>> Let us know when you can which group you've identified as related.
>> We can probably work with these groups to merge lom2ld.
>>
>> Another possibility is to leave lom2ld open.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Coralie
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:02:43 +0200, Haag, Jason <jhaag75@gmail.com>  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Good point. Please forgive me, there has actually been some great
>>> research work / activity by Enayat Rajabi:
>>>
>>> http://www.erajabi.com/Uploads/W3CDraft.html
>>>
>>> If there is real interest in moving this work to IEEE LTSC please let
>>> me know. I'm a member of that group. It is currently chaired by Avrron
>>> Barr, avronbarr@gmail.com.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Enayat Rajabi <enayatrajabi@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:51 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Closing your Community Group?
>>> To: "Haag, Jason" <jhaag75@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: team-community-process <team-community-process@w3.org>,
>>> public-lom2ld@w3.org
>>>
>>>
>>> According to my studies, there are already many repositories with
>>> thousands resources aligned their metadata to IEEE LOM. The main
>>> purpose of this community was to map the IEEE LOM to RDF. There are
>>> some works that map IEEE LOM to DC even by Dublin Core community,
>>> however the mapping did not consider taxonomy and hierarchical
>>> structure of IEEE LOM. This community group also wants to pursue the
>>> IEEE LTSC to publish IEEE LOM vocabularies/taxonomies online for all
>>> developers/researchers and so on.
>>>
>>> One possibility would be merging this group to other related groups,
>>> instead of closing it.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Haag, Jason <jhaag75@gmail.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't feel this group is necessary and agree it should probably be
>>>> closed.
>>>>
>>>> LRMI incorporated some of the LOM elements and is already available as
>>>> RDF.
>>>>
>>>> http://dublincore.org/dcx/lrmi-terms/
>>>>
>>>> If there are any LOM elements that are missing or that members of this
>>>> group think should be added then perhaps the more appropriate action
>>>> is to engage the IEEE LTSC (https://ieee-sa.imeetcentral.com/ltsc/) or
>>>> the DCMI (http://dublincore.org/dcx/lrmi-terms/1.1/), especially since
>>>> the DCMI is now the steward of the LRMI work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>  
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Dear all,
>>>> >
>>>> > Your Community Group is among the groups launched more than 6 months
>>>> ago
>>>> > with 5 people or fewer and appears to be unused.
>>>> > The W3C Team proposes to *CLOSE* it in 10 days or so, per the
>>>> Community and
>>>> > Business Group Process [1] (relevant parts quoted below), unless  
>>>> there
>>>> are
>>>> > compelling arguments not to.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > [1] Community and Business Group Process
>>>> > <https://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/>
>>>> >
>>>> > Duration and Closure of a Community Group
>>>> > -----------------------------------------
>>>> >
>>>> > Once a Community Group has been launched, participants may continue  
>>>> to
>>>> > work indefinitely, until the Community Development Lead closes the
>>>> group;
>>>> > see the grounds for closure.
>>>> >
>>>> > No less than ten business days before closing a group, the Community
>>>> > Development Lead must alert the participants. Once closed, no
>>>> individuals
>>>> > may join, and discussions stop. However, W3C makes available
>>>> information
>>>> > about closed Community Groups and archives of their communications.
>>>> >
>>>> > Closed Community Groups are re-opened following the creation  
>>>> process.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Grounds for Closure of a Community Group
>>>> > ----------------------------------------
>>>> > The Community Development Lead may close a Community Group in any of
>>>> > following circumstances:
>>>> >
>>>> >      Chair Request. The Group Chair requests that the group be  
>>>> closed
>>>> > (e.g., as the result of a group decision, or on a certain date
>>>> selected in
>>>> > advance by the group).
>>>> >      Inactivity. The number of participants drops below 3 for an
>>>> extended
>>>> > period, or because participant activity (e.g., as measured by
>>>> > communications among participants) ceases for an extended period.
>>>> >      Agreement Violations. When, in the judgment of the Community
>>>> > Development Lead, the group has committed a serious violation of  
>>>> this
>>>> > policy, for instance exceeding its scope.
>>>> >
>>>> > The Community Development Lead and Chair should discuss the group’s
>>>> status
>>>> > before the Community Development Lead initiates closure.
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Coralie Mercier  -  W3C Marketing & Communications -  http://www.w3.org
>> mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
>>


-- 
Coralie Mercier  -  W3C Marketing & Communications -  http://www.w3.org
mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/

Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 19:43:45 UTC