- From: Vahid Shaik <vahid@dnsrobot.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 08:46:17 +0000
- To: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BL4P223MB1311CB671F6EE6ADB788409CC47EA@BL4P223MB1311.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Hello, I have been working on implementing Linked Open Data principles within DNS and network diagnostic tools at DNS Robot (https://dnsrobot.net<https://dnsrobot.net/>). The platform provides 53 free DNS and network utilities including DNS propagation checking, WHOIS lookup, SSL certificate validation, and HTTP header analysis. We have implemented JSON-LD structured data across every tool page using Schema.org<http://schema.org/> WebApplication and FAQPage schemas, with full i18n support across 12 locales. Each tool page includes machine-readable structured data describing the tool's functionality, input/output types, and supported DNS record types (A, AAAA, CNAME, MX, TXT, SOA, NS). One challenge we encountered was representing DNS query results as structured data. DNS records have well-defined schemas (RFC 1035, RFC 9110) but no standardized RDF vocabulary. We currently use Schema.org<http://schema.org/>'s generic PropertyValue for DNS results, but a dedicated DNS ontology would better serve the LOD community. Has there been any discussion around standardizing RDF vocabularies for DNS data? I would be interested in contributing to or collaborating on such an effort. Best regards, Shaik Vahid DNS Robot — https://dnsrobot.net<https://dnsrobot.net/> Free DNS & Network Tools
Received on Monday, 2 March 2026 16:38:50 UTC