- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 13:55:07 +0100
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhK7wusQ2_uBgFCuJiafakX75+jQ--ky2f0JgsAGbnyuhA@mail.gmail.com>
Very old thread, but I still have a need for versioning data. It seems that representationTechnique vocab is now deprecated So I think the modern version is schema : schemaVersion now, which I think I'll go with. po 14. 1. 2013 v 21:38 odesÃlatel Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> napsal: > > > On 3 January 2013 13:16, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > >> This issue comes up more than one would hope. Ivan Herman's work on >> http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ is one answer (as Tim has pointed out) and >> dcterms:format doesn't quite cover it. When working on ADMS we had to come >> up with a new Class and property pair. See http://www.w3.org/ns/adms# >> adms:representationTechnique >> >> (ADMS is under development in the W3C Gov Linked Data WG but is already >> being used by various public sector bodies). >> > > > Thanks Phil, Tim ... I'm going to go with > > http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#representationTechnique > > Bearing in mind it's more or a hint that a bot can stiff when it gets > confused, rather than, a hard and fast rule ... > > >> >> HTH >> >> Phil. >> >> >> On 03/01/2013 11:55, Tim Haynes wrote: >> >>> On 01/02/2013 10:59 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>> >>>> Was wondering if anyone knew of a predicate that could be used to define >>>> the data format in a document. >>>> >>>> It's not the MIME type, more a level of granularity within a mime type >>>> to represent certain evolutions of the project. >>>> >>>> I've looked at >>>> >>>> owl : versionInfo -- but that seems only to apply to ontologies >>>> doap : version -- but that seems to apply to projects >>>> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/doc#version -- seems to be the >>>> version of the document >>>> >>>> What I'm looking for is a string that say the data in the document is of >>>> a certain kind e.g. opensocial v0.1 vs opensocial v0.2 >>>> >>>> I know RDF should be perfectly self descriptive, but this will give the >>>> processor a hint as to what it will find, any bugs etc. >>>> >>> >>> How about >>> http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=terms#MediaType >>> or >>> something in http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ >>> ? >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> ~Tim >>> >> >> -- >> >> Phil Archer >> W3C eGovernment >> See you at the Transatlantic Research on Policy Modelling Workshop >> January 28 - 29 2013, Washington DC >> Details at http://www.crossover-project.eu/workshop.aspx >> >> http://philarcher.org >> +44 (0)7887 767755 >> @philarcher1 >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2026 12:55:23 UTC