- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 10:07:39 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Cc: LJC <lj.garcia.co@gmail.com>, mara-damalos-airdem@googlegroups.com
- Message-ID: <0ebed522-094f-4348-98fa-45d6d42f9b02@csarven.ca>
On 2025-01-23 13:57, LJC wrote: > DaMaLOS 2025 - 5th Workshop on Metadata and Research (objects) > Management for Linked Open Science > >https://zbmed.github.io/damalos/ This workshop seems exciting! Is there any chance that submissions and final publications could be required to use a format that better aligns with the architecture of the Web? For example, while the workshop strongly emphasises the FAIR manifesto and "Linked" Open Science, past and expected publications are in PDF format, lacking deep links to significant content (see also https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#Universality2 ) as well as richer structural elements that enable machine-readable access. And so, if FAIR is of significance, the approach taken by this workshop (and the resulting publications) clearly fails to conform to the FAIR principles. I presume the authors consider various aspects of their findings to be "significant" yet there is no way for consumers to directly link to, process, or systematically discover these specific units of information using web-standard solutions that facilitate structured interoperability. Would you agree that this would be an improvement in scientific communication, making research easier to share and reference? I'm asking because I'd like to understand from the organisers of this and similar events what it would take on their end to drive meaningful change. -Sarven https://csarven.ca/#i
Attachments
- application/pgp-keys attachment: OpenPGP public key
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2025 09:07:46 UTC