- From: Filip Ilievski <filip.dbrsk@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 20:20:38 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANbunvj6A83giDZEXRt9XsQ+arzQLMmFCsnRfkwW1jS3nm3yEA@mail.gmail.com>
Analogy-ANGLE is a new interdisciplinary workshop co-located with IJCAI 2024 on August 3rd or 4th, 2024 in Jeju, South Korea. Analogy-ANGLE aims to bring together researchers with an interest in analogical abstraction from natural language processing, cognitive psychology, computer vision, deep learning, and neuro-symbolic AI. This workshop will enable a common ground where the complementary perspectives from these fields can come together to form a comprehensive picture of the current landscape of analogical abstraction, and point to standing challenges, evaluation methodologies, and emerging techniques of interest. Thus, we organize this workshop at IJCAI where leading researchers from the focal areas are gathered. The multidisciplinary nature of the workshop is emphasized by the broad set of skills of the organization team and the program committee, and the diversity principle guiding the list of topics and the invited keynotes.\ Workshop website: https://analogy-angle.github.io/ Speakers Ken Forbus, Northwestern University Tony Veale, UC Dublin Important Dates - Submission deadline: May 3rd, 2024 - Notifications sent: June 4th, 2024 The deadline time is 23:59 anywhere on Earth. Topics We invite contributions ranging from cognitive modeling and algorithms and methods to new tasks and new applications of analogy. Contributions that take an interdisciplinary perspective are particularly encouraged. Topics include (but are not limited to) the following: - Cognitive modeling - Analogy and abstraction - Analogy and conceptual metaphor - Analogy, figurative language, sarcasm, and irony - Cognitive frameworks of analogy - Cognitive/psychological studies on analogy involving human participants - Algorithms and methods - Studies of the analogical abilities of large language models and visual diffusion models - Algorithmic approaches to analogy - Augmentation and verification of large language and vision models through analogy - Neuro-symbolic AI architectures for analogical abstraction - Extracting analogies from knowledge bases - Tasks and benchmarks - Matching narratives and situational descriptions through narratives - Novel tasks and benchmarks for evaluating analogies in text and vision - Analogy in longer formats, e.g., narratives and videos - Analogy and visual abstraction tasks - Analogical discovery and computational creativity - Applications - Analogies for personalization, explanation, and collaboration - Novel applications of analogical abstraction - Studies of the impact of analogy in specific applications and domains, including education, innovation, and law Submission Guidelines Submissions can fall into one of the following categories: 1. Full Research Papers (up to 7 pages plus 2 pages for references) - Papers with original research work will be judged on their technical soundness and rigor, though allowances made for novel or experimental directions. We also welcome submissions reporting negative results and sharing experimental insights on the technical challenges and issues of analogical abstraction. 2. Short Papers (up to 4 pages) - Position papers or reports of ongoing work on new research directions. 3. Dissemination Papers - Already published papers from top AI venues such as IJCAI, NeurIPS, AAAI, ICML, ICLR, ACL, and EMNLP that are relevant to the workshop. Please upload the original submission and abstract to our submission site. Full and short research papers will be peer-reviewed by at least two reviewers from the PC. Accepted full and short papers will be included in the proceedings of the workshop. Dissemination papers will go through a short review from the organizers, checking for their quality and relevance to the workshop. Dissemination papers will not be included in the workshop proceedings. Submissions should be anonymized and the review will be double-blind. Preprints can be stored on arXiv. Organizing Committee - Filip Ilievski (VU Amsterdam) - Pia Sommerauer (VU Amsterdam) - Marianna Bolognesi (University of Bologna) - Ute Schmid (University of Bamberg) - Dafna Shahaf (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Contact: analogy-angle@groups.google.com Program Committee - Lisa Beinborn (VU Amsterdam) - Tommaso Caselli (RU Groningen) - Bettina Finzel (University of Bamberg) - Yifan Jiang (University of Southern California) - Kaixin Ma (Tencent AI) - Zhivar Sourati (University of Southern California) - Anna Thaler (University of Bamberg) - Riccardo Tommasini (INSA Lyon) - Piek Vossen (VU Amsterdam) - …will be extended shortly Background Analogical abstraction is a fundamental cognitive skill unique to humans (Penn et al., 2008; Hofstadter, 2001), defined as the ability to perceive and utilize the similarities between concepts, situations or events based on (systems of) relations rather than surface similarities (Holyoak, 2012; Gentner et al., 2012). Analogy enables creative inferences, explanations, and generalization of knowledge, and has been used for scientific inventions (Dunbar and Klahr, 2012), solving problems (Gick and Holyoak, 1980), and policy-making (Houghton, 1998). As such, it has been the goal of one of the first AI programs developed by Evans (1964). It has also been the subject of cognitive theories and studies about humans for common processes, such as the retrieval of memories (Wharton et al., 1994) and problem-solving (Gick and Holyoak, 1980), mostly leveraging narratives as their experimental medium (Gentner and Toupin, 1986; Gentner et al., 1993; Wharton et al., 1994), given their multi-tiered nature and potential for abstraction. Meanwhile, analogical tasks have also been a relatively popular topic in natural language processing (NLP) and artificial intelligence (AI), typically framed as intelligence tests for models compared against humans. So-called word-based, proportional analogies of the form (A : B :: C : D) (Mikolov et al., 2013a,b; Gladkova et al., 2016; Ushio et al., 2021) are often used to measure the potential of word embeddings and language models. Recent studies (Webb et al., 2023) show a strong ability of state-of-the-art (SOTA) large language models (LLMs) to discover proportional word analogies, though this skill degrades with higher complexity (Wijesiriwardene et al., 2023) or when controlling for association-based answers (Stevenson et al., 2023). Shifting toward more complex settings, narrative-based analogy benchmarks that involve system mappings rather than simple word-based relational mappings have been also been considered recently, with limitations in scope, generalizability, and alignment with cognitive theories (Nagarajah et al., 2022; Wijesiriwardene et al., 2023; Sourati et al., 2023). Meanwhile, given the potential of large language and visual models, another line of research aims to study their ability to draw analogies consistently (cf., Webb et al., 2023). Given the richness of analogical abstraction and the wide interest in this topic from artificial intelligence, linguistics, and cognitive psychology, it is important to connect these communities and facilitate cross-disciplinary activities.
Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2024 18:20:54 UTC