- From: <john.nj.davies@bt.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:28:41 +0000
- To: <danbri@danbri.org>, <cstadler@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- CC: <public-lod@w3.org>, <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CWXP123MB2264C68504349567C2DAE6C8A8CD0@CWXP123MB2264.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Yep From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> Sent: 28 March 2020 12:08 To: Claus Stadler <cstadler@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>; Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> Subject: Re: blank predicates yup - really just invent a property for it or say nothing by not adding a triple unless you have some kind of idea how the things are sort-of related then the triple adds literally no information On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 10:19, Claus Stadler <cstadler@informatik.uni-leipzig.de<mailto:cstadler@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>> wrote: <> is a relative IRI with an empty string relative to some base IRI - so Linked Data clients will typically replace it with the file:// or http(s):// URL of the document they read from. So don't use that, unless you want location-dependent predicates :) Cheers, Claus On 28.03.20 11:03, Melvin Carvalho wrote: On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 10:53, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org<mailto:danbri@danbri.org>> wrote: there are an infinite number of boring relationships that hold between any arbitrary pair of objects; your best bet might be to name one for your application rather than attempt to use generalized (predicateless) rdf So maybe simply <> ? #Alice <> #Bob . Dan On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 08:57, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com<mailto:melvincarvalho@gmail.com>> wrote: I am working on a information mapping system (aka mind maps) And I want to have two nodes related to each other #Alice R #Bob In the general sense, the type of relationship (predicate) R is not really known at the time of creation. My software currently does not allow the labeling of edges is the reason (but hopefully in future it will) I need a way to relate Alice to Bob but I dont have a URI for a predicate. Is there something that can operate as a "blank predicate"? Or some existing relations that simply says that two entities or linked / related, without yet knowing how they are related? -- Dipl. Inf. Claus Stadler Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig Research Group: http://aksw.org/ Workpage & WebID: http://aksw.org/ClausStadler Phone: +49 341 97-32260
Received on Saturday, 28 March 2020 18:29:00 UTC