Re: uri4uri.net

 Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote:"... It is okay to drop the domain name afterwards."
Sarven, when is "afterwards" ?  There are some unavoidable commercial race conditions around raw data collection, I think. 
 
In the age of Tracking Cookies, Juvenal's question "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" becomes very important for secondary sources (eg Dashboards) and archives.  The best Dashboard visualizations do not bias the data collection with third-party Tracking Cookies - in effect creating a tertiary source.

So, for example, this effort to curate Covid-19 URI "leaks" preliminary results to Google Analytics (if allowed) but this effort at a Dashboard for Covid-19 does not set any Tracking Cookies at all.
The web can not add value to Epidemiology et al. semantics by changing data collection methods.  Neither the Internet Archive nor the CIA World Factbook, incidentally, set any third party Tracking Cookies for example.  In contrast, computer security is assumed (without proof I might add) to "tolerate" this flyover bias.
--Gannon
    On Friday, February 21, 2020, 8:47:29 AM CST, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote: 

An alternative to renewal:

In a long enough timeline, what's essential is that all content within
its URI space has archived snapshots at different services. It is okay
to drop the domain name afterwards.

-Sarven
https://csarven.ca/#i