W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > September 2018

Re: DBpedia & foaf:surname

From: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:02:06 +0100
To: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CA3A16E7-B844-44A4-9172-15FDC04B7A75@glasers.org>

Only three other responses - all saying "It does not affect me at the moment, and Yes".

Which I think isn't enough to bother the DBpedia team with the question, unless someone here from the team wants to raise it.

It does make me puzzle over who might be using DBpedia in anger, but that's an altogether different question :-)

Thanks for your time.

> On 24 Sep 2018, at 13:29, Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org> wrote:
> Hi.
> My apologies if this is a well-known issue that has been resolved, but I can't recall anything on the LOD list.
> DBpedia uses foaf:surname
> According to the spec (http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/), this is an Archaic form, and the Core (Testing!) form is foaf:familyName
> (DBpedia does use the Core foaf:givenName.)
> Occasionally I find this quite awkward, when combining sources, and indeed I find myself using foaf:surname in my own data for compatibility.
> (Which really sticks in my craw :-) )
> I think that foaf:familyName is more culturally neutral, and easier for non-English-speaking people to comprehend, which is why the FOAF team chose it as Core, I presume.
> ====================================
> So, would there be any enthusiasm among consumers here for asking the excellent DBpedia team if we can have foaf:familyName?
> ====================================
> I doubt that they/we would want to move to it, because that would break legacy stuff that already depends on having foaf:surname, which probably includes some of my own stuff :-)
> But simply adding foaf:familyName wouldn't be a big deal for their tooling, I guess, and shouldn't break existing consumers' stuff.
> (Ain't that the nice thing about RDF!)
> If you don't want to discuss it here, but simply say "yes" or "no" etc, so we can get a sense of things, I've created a Poll at
> https://goo.gl/forms/G1yCegjFm3fVHAg62
> (sorry if the Poll is crap - I haven't done one before!)
> I have no idea how the suggestion might be received by the DBpedia team - it may be that they will like it a lot, but having a sense of enthusiasm for it might be useful to prioritise etc..
> I'll give it a few days and see what happens and report back here.
> Best
> -- 
> Hugh
> 023 8061 5652

023 8061 5652
Received on Friday, 28 September 2018 13:02:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:22:47 UTC