- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 19:43:50 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On 2018-04-10 18:18, Krzysztof Janowicz wrote: > Yes, exactly. IMHO, there are two big next steps. First, getting > authoritative data providers to publish their own data as Linked Data > instead of us as research community triplifiying their data. This is the > only way to ensure maintenance and quality on the long term. Second, > simplifying the interaction with Linked Data to integrate it into > internal as well as external workflows. I hate to say it, but many of > our technologies and KR languages are too complicated. Finally, ideally, > we would try to take the data from IOS, Springer, Elsevier, and so forth > and show the value proposition of Linked Data in action by designing > interesting services on top of them. This could be in the form of a > challenge or workshop. As IOS Press has also published document > embeddings and linked them to the papers, such services can use very > rich data. To some degree our Linked Data Scientometrics are such a service. Do you think that it may be more efficient, affordable, and reasonable to create and publish our own Linked Data, instead of: * giving our data to a third-party; * triplifying "their" data and having it available from their platform; * conducting further research and building dependency to their platform -Sarven http://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2018 17:44:21 UTC