- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:34:55 -0500
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On 01/20/2017 02:36 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote: . . . > Am I misunderstanding the NQuad document, or should there be > (presumably) 3 different blank nodes here? It looks to me like it should have been 3 different blank nodes. The TriG spec explicitly states: https://www.w3.org/TR/trig/#terms-blanks-nodes "BlankNodes sharing the same label in differently labeled graph statements are considered to be the same BlankNode." And the RDF Semantics document discusses shared (and non-shared) blank nodes: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-mt/#unions_merges David Booth
Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 22:35:28 UTC