- From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 21:50:01 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: Kevin Ford <kefo@3windmills.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Amen to that. There is a real measurable advantage to data set layouts used to load Outbound Telemarketing Campaigns into Telephone Switches (optimized access to "next record", skipping "previous success"). The print version to this layout is called a "Phone Book" and we have Museums full of them. They are not the future of Linked Data, Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing, etc.. They are the history of intrusion and spam. Possible approaches ... ------------------------------ 1) "Good riddance to bad rubbish" 2) "Never Again !" If I had to choose ... Both. Right here. Right now. --Gannon -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 10/4/16, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: Subject: Re: Role of RDFa in 2016 To: "Martynas Jusevičius" <martynas@graphity.org> Cc: "Kevin Ford" <kefo@3windmills.com>, "Linked Data community" <public-lod@w3.org> Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016, 7:09 AM > I don't see how one can avoid RDFa if we consider WYSIWYG content > (HTML) editing with inline semantic annotations (RDF). Just because we edit them that way, doesn't mean we have to publish them that way. Ruben
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2016 21:53:21 UTC