- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:23:35 +0200
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: Kevin Ford <kefo@3windmills.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
I don't see how one can avoid RDFa if we consider WYSIWYG content (HTML) editing with inline semantic annotations (RDF). Too bad current XHTML+RDFa editors suck. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > I always had doubts about the whole RDFa idea; > it mixes representations for two different consumers. > > I'm more in favor of content negotiation, > serving dedicated representations per consumer. > Makes Turtle/JSON-LD/… a much easier choice as well: > you can easily and transparently support multiple ones. > > Ruben > > PS That said, I do publish (additionally) RDFa myself, > by I indeed consider it overkill.
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2016 11:24:11 UTC