Re: No acceptable. (was Re: Fwd: Deadline Extension for WebNLG 2016)

Hi Phil: tone aside, I missed that mail, then sure I won't send anything
else.
Yet let me be surprised about it: although W3C is not a
research organization, a lot of its community is, and in these venues much
work has been done that results to be useful for W3C.
Best
Aldo

On Monday, May 30, 2016, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

> Aldo,
>
> Please see and respect
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2016May/0032.html
>
>
>
> On 30/05/2016 15:35, Aldo Gangemi wrote:
>
>> Final Call For Papers (with apologies for cross-posting)
>>
>
>
> Don't do it, then you won't have to apologise.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>