Re: Survey: Use of this list for Calls for Papers

On 2016-03-30 13:21, Phil Archer wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> A perennial topic at W3C is whether we should allow calls for papers to
> be posted to our mailing lists. Many argue, passionately, that we should
> not allow any CfPs on any lists. It is now likely that this will be the
> policy, with any message detected as being a CfP marked as spam (and
> therefore blocked).
>
> Historically, the semantic-web and public-lod lists have been used for
> CfPs and we are happy for this to continue *iff* you want it.
>
> Last time we asked, the consensus was that CfPs were seen as useful, but
> it's time to ask you again.
>
> Please take a minute to answer the 4 question, no need for free text,
> survey at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/1/
>
> Thanks
>
> Phil.
>

Excellent! Completed survey.

So, if this goes through, will there be public-lod-CfP-PDF (as per my 
suggestion)? :P

-Sarven
http://csarven.ca/#i

Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2016 11:45:48 UTC