- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:45:06 +0200
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>, LOD List <public-lod@w3.org>
On 2016-03-30 13:21, Phil Archer wrote: > Dear all, > > A perennial topic at W3C is whether we should allow calls for papers to > be posted to our mailing lists. Many argue, passionately, that we should > not allow any CfPs on any lists. It is now likely that this will be the > policy, with any message detected as being a CfP marked as spam (and > therefore blocked). > > Historically, the semantic-web and public-lod lists have been used for > CfPs and we are happy for this to continue *iff* you want it. > > Last time we asked, the consensus was that CfPs were seen as useful, but > it's time to ask you again. > > Please take a minute to answer the 4 question, no need for free text, > survey at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/1/ > > Thanks > > Phil. > Excellent! Completed survey. So, if this goes through, will there be public-lod-CfP-PDF (as per my suggestion)? :P -Sarven http://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2016 11:45:48 UTC