Re: Mediatypes that map to application/ld+json with a profile

Hey Archer-nonymous, I think you just invented the CfP Policy DOS Attack on Bayesian spam filters.
Bouncy, bouncy ... Nice.
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 7/15/16, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

 Subject: Re: Mediatypes that map to application/ld+json with a profile
 To: "Sarven Capadisli" <info@csarven.ca>, public-lod@w3.org
 Date: Friday, July 15, 2016, 9:34 AM
 
 Hi Sarven,
 
 I need to be *very* careful
 how I say this or I am going to get so much 
 flak for promoting a workshop on this list ;-),
 but I can't help but 
 point out that
 this topic is very much in scope of
 https://www.w3.org/2016/11/sdsvoc/
 
 Format/serialisation/Mime
 Type, whatever, is not enough. You need to 
 know the profile. Erik Wilde has an internet
 draft on this [1] too.
 
 That
 approach - using HTTP Linked Headers is probably the
 simplest. 
 Should we also consider it as
 another dimension of content negotiation? 
 For example, I might ask a catalogue for
 metadata about a given dataset 
 using
 DCAT-AP, or DDI and that's independent of whether
 it's in JSON, 
 Turtle or whatever.
 
 Actually, I really do have to
 send out a CfP for that workshop, which I 
 will do, but not here, or I'll have to
 remonstrate with myself from now 
 until next
 year.
 
 Phil.
 
 [1] https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6906.txt
 
 On 15/07/2016 15:16, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
 > On 2016-07-15 09:44, Ghislain Atemezing
 wrote:
 >>> Are there mediatypes
 that map to application/ld+json with a profile?
 >>> Only aware of
 application/activity+json
 >>
 >> Not happy with this content here https://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ ?
 >> Specially this line https://www.w3.org/ns/formats/data/JSON-LD
 ?
 >
 > Thanks
 Ghislain.
 >
 > I meant
 the equivalences that can be made between JSON conventions
 and
 > JSON-LD.
 >
 > Is there anything out there that's
 treating a JSON mediatype with
 >
 application/ld+json + profile?
 >
 > e.g., application/ld+json;
 > profile="http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams"
 and
 > application/activity+json is one of
 those as far as I know.
 >
 > Also raised this in GeoJSON-LD since
 GeoJSON uses application/geo+json:
 > https://github.com/geojson/geojson-ld/issues/41
 >
 > If any, what else is
 out there?
 >
 >
 -Sarven
 > http://csarven.ca/#i
 >
 >
 
 -- 
 
 
 Phil Archer
 W3C Data Activity
 Lead
 http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
 
 http://philarcher.org
 +44 (0)7887 767755
 @philarcher1

Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 21:02:22 UTC