CFPs and the lists from Hugh Glaser on 2016-07-07 (public-lod@w3.org from July 2016)

From: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 17:05:55 +0100
To: Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7FDE8390-A596-4F8D-80B0-B659845FF202@glasers.org>

Hmmm.
So I am enjoying the new regime without CfPs on the LOD list (many thanks, Phil!).
However, I now find myself thinking I will unsubscribe from the SemWeb list, since it is almost all CfPs, few, if any, of which I want.

I think this may be an unintended consequence (although probably predictable) - losing people from SemWeb.

There isn’t really a question here - I just thought I would report it.
If there is a question: dare I suggest that now things have settled down, and we can see how things are working, that we might want to revisit the idea of having a separate list for CfPs, and reclaim the SemWeb list for discussion? (Sorry Phil?)
Or is the answer that I simply set mail filters and carry on?

Best
Hugh

Received on Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:06:27 UTC