Re: Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies from Martynas Jusevičius on 2016-08-09 (public-lod@w3.org from August 2016)

From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:00:12 +0200
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAE35VmxS=+V-MFAcAycAwKhksLtgOwS-TcELsKSiJBXZ4+Jvag@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks everyone!

DOAP + PROV sounds like a good idea actually.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> wrote:
> On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>>
>> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap
>>
>> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not
>> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects.
>
>
> Just a thought:  would DOAP + PROV fit the bill?
>
> #g
> --
>

Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2016 09:00:43 UTC