- From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 15:25:40 +0000
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Martynas, > I am not convinced your use case requires a whole new concept (and > following implementations) of "Linked Data profiles". > > I have outlined practical solutions you already can use now: > 1. use a single description including all vocabularies I have real customers that say already now that this solution is not acceptable to them. > 2. make separate resources with separate descriptions Could work, but I prefer a resource-centric model where I simply deliver different descriptions about the same resource. > 3. give the client SPARQL access Not all clients want to talk sparql. > It seems to me that you have a hypothetical solution and are looking > for a problem. Might be. I'm still not convinced of the opposite being true, though. Best, Lars
Received on Thursday, 7 May 2015 15:26:08 UTC