W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Advancing the DBpedia ontology

From: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 07:00:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+u4+a3Ws-XvgZZtjPZiPLCHJVTaeZ7_YC+n=Yak8CM5WxoeqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <
pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is there going to be the possibility of at least listening in remotely?
>

Hard to say if we can but will try.
However, what we can do is have this GDoc [1] where everyone can give some
feedback in advance.
We will use the same document to discuss all ideas and keep minutes.


[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XWSNpFEM1CNHgZ2ITNa7QnFy1kK-CL3YdWzaybevbFQ/edit


>
> peter
>
>
> On 01/24/2015 12:02 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > ATM I can only answer for disjointness axioms. We plan to use them for
> > cleaning up extracted data so we definitely want them. For the rest, we
> > are open to suggestions and this is one of the reasons we invite ontology
> > experts to participate.
> >
> > Best, Dimitris
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> > <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Good points all, I think.
> >
> > As well I would like to know what expressive power is being considered
> > for the ontology language.  For example, will disjointness axioms be
> > allowed, or local ranges, or constraints?
> >
> > peter
> >
> > On 01/23/2015 12:23 PM, Nicolas Torzec wrote:
> >> Hi Dimitris et al.,
> >
> >> A) What is the specific use you have in mind?
> >
> >> B) Are you thinking about a centralized ontology managed by editors, a
> >> user-contributed ontology, or an automatically generated taxonomy?
> >
> >> C) How will it relate to other ontologies, taxonomies and schemas?
> >> Also, will it relate to Wikidata, Wikipedia, schema.org
> >> <http://schema.org>,
> > Facebook OG, etc.
> >
> >> D) How will you categorize Wiki pages (and possibly other documents)
> >> against this ontology?
> >
> >> Cheers. -N.
> >
> >> -- Nicolas Torzec Yahoo Labs.
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> > GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in
> > Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of
> > bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely
> > compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
> > _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion
> > mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> > <mailto:Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of
> > Leipzig Research Group: http://aksw.org
> > Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUw801AAoJECjN6+QThfjzd3gH/0zre80KqwpW2c/8Ugwd+KpU
> T94TmAmp+wKmyp5zLzvjXWPETLsnf9tPhTgK+tdPJBLqBsK+3aRO8pEA2h7oFpFy
> fJ//Jj7hOLEzg7/MkMRl3twnvylK3V1SybR2S/QIBjTuRPcRfRl5guxKd9L2yIIP
> ANAWtHpwb9RHepG/+E4GWIdeONc2QeaZp4Pf4siWDgKva/SKxMMn4XObFAJ/TY/H
> uAsXsqboou0mr8i1FyMt0CWoTmOZD7Ki3obZ/zQiwiV/CkBurZ+/tCbjN7dLKAbT
> iMRK7r5M0GN5Ow56rSwe5Y9uro3Pm1UIl/JohdTWExP04YLd4e1hC+p8qn+91lU=
> =ocPv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
> _______________________________________________
> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
> Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>



-- 
Dimitris Kontokostas
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Research Group: http://aksw.org
Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
Received on Sunday, 25 January 2015 05:01:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:22:18 UTC