- From: Herbert Van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:42:10 -0700
- To: "jschneider@pobox.com" <jschneider@pobox.com>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <808BEB45-6EA8-4E61-B2C8-F8738AA55063@gmail.com>
On Jan 20, 2015, at 3:05, Jodi Schneider <jschneider@pobox.com> wrote: >> From: Herbert Van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com> >> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:10:45 -0700 >> Message-Id: <464E492A-1394-4A59-9C1D-520F9CB631B9@gmail.com> >> Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org> >> To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> >> >> Larry >> How about HTTP Link headers (RFC 5988) to convey links and metadata expressed as links when serving PDFs? I can imagine an authoring tool embedding the info in XMP. But I have a harder time imagining a consumer application that would want to read the info via XMP. > > I don't: Bibliographic managers for PDFs could make use of XMP metadata. Imagine never typing another citation again! I thought bibliographic managers already did. If I remember correctly, some STM publishers did stuff metadata in XMP containers at one point. And I would have thought that bibliographic managers would then have used that. It would be telling if they didn't. But, anyhow, I admit my above sentence wasn't all that clear. I was really expressing my doubt that an "on web" Linked Data aggregating tool would start doing something special when encountering a PDF: pulling it across and then check whether anything interesting was in an XMP container. In my below proposal, an HTTP HEAD (needed anyhow to figure out whether a resource is a PDF) would suffice to obtain the links if they were provided in the HTTP Link header. Using IANA-registered relation types, those links would end up being a bit generic but they would be readily available. And rather easily transformable into RDF. Cheers Herbert > >> How about a web server add-on that can extract (and map/transform.) the info from the XMP container as the PDF is being served. And stuff it all in the HTTP Link header on the fly. > > This of course is a good idea but I don't think it's either/or. > > -Jodi > >> Cheers >> Herbert > >
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 14:42:41 UTC