- From: Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:09:00 -0500
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>, Paul Houle <ontology2@gmail.com>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABbsESfUApC1wpMciR-kgN9LNskS=KgtTcF1J6ASkZ52sbPa2w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi All, The infrastructure used in [1,2] to get transparency and auditability may be of interest for this discussion. Thanks for comments, -- Adrian [1] www.astd.org/Publications/Magazines/The-Public-Manager/Archives/2013/Fall/Social-Knowledge-Transfer-Using-Executable-English [2] www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/GrowthAndDebt1.agent On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > > On Feb 20, 2015, at 2:42 AM, Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de> > wrote: > > > > > Hello Paul, > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:19:06PM +0100, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: > >>> Another case is where there really is a total ordering. For > instance, the > >>> authors of a scientific paper might get excited if you list them in the > >>> wrong order. One weird old trick for this is RDF containers, which > are > >>> specified in the XMP dialect of Dublin Core > >> > >> How do you bring this in line with <property> rdfs:range <datatype>, > especially > >> <property> rdfs:range rdf:langString? I do not see a contradiction but > this > >> makes things quite ugly. > >> > >> How about all the SPARQL queries that assume a literal as object and > not a RDF > >> container? > > > > Another simpler example would be <property> rdfs:range foaf:Person. > > http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_Person says that "Something is a > Person if it > > is a person". How can an RDF container of several persons be a person? > > According the US Supreme Court a corporation is a person, so I would guess > that a mere container would have no trouble geting past the censors. > > Pat > > > > > If one can put a container where a container is not explicitly > sanctioned by > > the semantics of the property, then I have missed something important. > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael Brunnbauer > > > > -- > > ++ Michael Brunnbauer > > ++ netEstate GmbH > > ++ Geisenhausener Straße 11a > > ++ 81379 München > > ++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80 > > ++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 > > ++ E-Mail brunni@netestate.de > > ++ http://www.netestate.de/ > > ++ > > ++ Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München) > > ++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342 > > ++ Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer > > ++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 home > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile (preferred) > phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 20 February 2015 18:09:49 UTC