Hello Paul, On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:19:06PM +0100, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: > > Another case is where there really is a total ordering. For instance, the > > authors of a scientific paper might get excited if you list them in the > > wrong order. One weird old trick for this is RDF containers, which are > > specified in the XMP dialect of Dublin Core > > How do you bring this in line with <property> rdfs:range <datatype>, especially > <property> rdfs:range rdf:langString? I do not see a contradiction but this > makes things quite ugly. > > How about all the SPARQL queries that assume a literal as object and not a RDF > container? Another simpler example would be <property> rdfs:range foaf:Person. http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_Person says that "Something is a Person if it is a person". How can an RDF container of several persons be a person? If one can put a container where a container is not explicitly sanctioned by the semantics of the property, then I have missed something important. Regards, Michael Brunnbauer -- ++ Michael Brunnbauer ++ netEstate GmbH ++ Geisenhausener Straße 11a ++ 81379 München ++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80 ++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 ++ E-Mail brunni@netestate.de ++ http://www.netestate.de/ ++ ++ Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München) ++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342 ++ Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer ++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel
Received on Friday, 20 February 2015 08:43:12 UTC