- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:09:02 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <543599DE.4010506@openlinksw.com>
On 10/8/14 3:13 PM, Sarven Capadisli wrote: > On 2014-10-08 18:38, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> Sarven, >> >> Linked Open Data dogfooding, re., issue tracking i.e., a 5-Star Linked >> Open Data URI that identifies Github issue tracker for Linked Data >> Research: >> >> [1] >> http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/id/entity/https/github.com/csarven/linked-research/issues/4 >> >> -- Linked Open Data URI (basic entity description page) >> [2] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/c/8FDBH7 -- deeper follow-your-nose >> over relations facets oriented entity description page >> [3] >> http://bit.ly/vapor-report-on-linked-data-uri-that-identifies-a-github-issue-re-linked-research-data >> >> -- Vapor Report (re., Linked Open Data principles adherence) . > > It's pretty cool that you can grab stuff out of GitHub issues, even > comments! > > "Papers" link to code and then to commits and issues. See also [1]. > > Even comments e.g., [2]. Or even in the direction of "paper" comments > which can be integrated and picked right up from the page e.g., [3]. > Just need to add ±1 buttons and triplify the review ;) With WebID+ACL, > we have the rest. > > Do I have write access (via WebID?)to something like [4] ? e.g., > deleting an older label or triple :) > > [1] http://git2prov.org/ > [2] > https://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http/csarven.ca/call-for-linked-research > > [3] > https://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http/csarven.ca/sense-of-lsd-analysis%01comment_20140808164434 > > [4] > http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/id/entity/https/github.com/csarven/linked-research/issues/4 > > > -Sarven Yes, there are WebID+TLS and/or NetID+TLS based ACLs [1][2][3] in place. In addition, you can always make a full TURTLE doc in some data space, or embed your TURTLE in any text slot (e.g., comments or description fields) provided by a Web app/service using Nanotation, and you are set re. payload for upload into URIBurner. Basically, you have the following RWW options: 1. Append RDF statements to the existing the RDF document (named graph) identified by IRI <http://csarven.ca/sense-of-lsd-analysis> -- all you do is refresh the URIBurner URI as data changes in github (?sponger:get=add at the end of a URIBurner URI has this effect) 2. Overwrite statements in the existing RDF document (named graph) -- simply add ?@Lookup@=&refresh=clean to the end of the URIBurner URI, for this effect. Of course there's lots more, but I'll let this flow one step at a time :-) Links: [1] http://bit.ly/enterprise-identity-management-and-attribute-based-access-controls [2] http://www.slideshare.net/kidehen/how-virtuoso-enables-attributed-based-access-controls/34 -- WebID-TLS (authenticates WebIDs) [3] hhttp://www.slideshare.net/kidehen/how-virtuoso-enables-attributed-based-access-controls/40 -- NetID-TLS (authenticates LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, G+, Amazon, Dropbox, and many other identities) [4] http://bit.ly/blog-post-about-nanotation -- Nanotation (this SHOULD work wherever you're able to input plain text). -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 20:09:25 UTC