- From: John Domingue <john.domingue@open.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:50:49 +0100
- To: Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@newcastle.ac.uk>
- CC: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, Mauro Dragoni <dragoni@fbk.eu>, Fabien Gordon <Fabien.Gandon@inria.fr>, Marta Sabou <marta.sabou@modul.ac.at>, Harald Sack <harald.sack@hpi.uni-potsdam.de>, <semantic-web@w3.org>, <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A679C9B4-1D8B-43EA-A640-99A708B0831B@open.ac.uk>
As well as being irritating, UK academics submitting to ESWC run the risk that their papers will not be open to REF submission; even if they are, we have to go to additional efforts to ensure they are green OA published. This is also true of ISWC which makes the semantic web a pretty unattractive area to do research in. for both ISWC and ESWC the PDFs are freely available e.g. see [1] John [1] http://2014.eswc-conferences.org/program/accepted-papers On 2 Oct 2014, at 12:23, Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@newcastle.ac.uk<mailto:phillip.lord@newcastle.ac.uk>> wrote: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca<mailto:info@csarven.ca>> writes: On 2014-10-01 13:36, Mauro Dragoni wrote: Papers should not exceed fifteen (15) pages in length and must be formatted according to the guidelines for LNCS authors. Papers must be submitted in PDF (Adobe's Portable Document Format) format. As I understand it, there is a disconnect between the submission format and what ESWC wishes to achieve or encourage [1]. Can someone please elaborate on how forcing researchers to use PDF to share their publicly funded knowledge instead of SW/LD technologies and tools better fulfills [1], or perhaps even contributes towards the Semantic Web "vision"? I would like to better discover and use SW research knowledge. ESWC encouraging and promoting PDF for knowledge sharing sets an unnecessary limit on discovery and use. Will you consider encouraging the use of Semantic Web / Linked Data technologies for Extended "Semantic Web" Conference paper submissions? Additionally, submission is to a closed access publisher, requiring us to sign our copyright away in return for, well, nothing. As well as being irritating, UK academics submitting to ESWC run the risk that their papers will not be open to REF submission; even if they are, we have to go to additional efforts to ensure they are green OA published. This is also true of ISWC which makes the semantic web a pretty unattractive area to do research in. Can we dump both Springer and PDF please? Phil _________________________________________ Deputy Director, Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK phone: 0044 1908 653800, fax: 0044 1908 653169 email: john.domingue@open.ac.uk<mailto:j.b.domingue@open.ac.uk> web: kmi.open.ac.uk/people/domingue/<http://kmi.open.ac.uk/people/domingue/> President, STI International Amerlingstrasse 19/35, Austria - 1060 Vienna phone: 0043 1 23 64 002 - 16, fax: 0043 1 23 64 002-99 email: john.domingue@sti2.org<mailto:john.domingue@sti2.org> web: www.sti2.org<http://www.sti2.org/> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302). The Open University is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2014 11:51:22 UTC