Re: Formats and icing (Was Re: [ESWC 2015] First Call for Paper)

Apologies, Sarven. I was just trying to point out some options and
resources for those who were interested.

On 10/1/14, 2:42 PM, "Sarven Capadisli" <info@csarven.ca> wrote:

>On 2014-10-01 19:10, Laura Dawson wrote:
>> What about EPUB, which is xHTML and has support for Schema.org markup?
>>It
>> also provides for fixed-layout.
>
>IMO, this particular discussion is not what we should be focusing on.
>And, it almost always deters from the main topic. There are a number of
>ways to get to "Web friendly" representations and presentations. EPUB?
>Sure. Whatever floats the author's boat. As long as we can precisely
>identify and be able to discover the items in research papers, that's
>all fine.
>
>I personally don't find the need to set any hard limitations on (X)HTML
>or which vocabularies to use. So, schema.org is not granular enough at
>this time. There are more appropriate ones out there e.g: e.g.,
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2014Jul/0179.html , but
>that doesn't mean that we can't use them along with schema.org.
>
>I favour plain HTML+CSS+RDFa to get things going e.g.:
>
>https://github.com/csarven/linked-research
>
>(I will not dwell on the use of SVG, MathML, JavaScript etc. at this
>point, but you get the picture).
>
>The primary focus right now is to have SW/LD venues compromise i.e., not
>insist only on Adobe's PDF, but welcome Web native technologies.
>
>Debating on which Doctype or vocabulary or whatever is like the icing on
>the cake. Can we first bring the flour into our kitchen?
>
>-Sarven
>http://csarven.ca/#i
>

Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2014 18:47:11 UTC