W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Using OWL ontology as data

From: Luca Matteis <lmatteis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:23:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CALp38ENHs88EczSqQn8efrxU-OVjABodPw81_zszmPLCqcYxgw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julien Plu <julien.plu@redaction-developpez.com>
Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
It seems like the property `oll:hasMeaning` you created doesn't have a
range of `owl:Class`. How's `oll:hasMeaning` defined? Perhaps adding
the triple `oll:hasMeaning rdfs:range owl:class .` will be enough.

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Julien Plu
<julien.plu@redaction-developpez.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try to create an ontology to lexicalize the french language. And in my
> vocabulary I link a lemma to his meaning which come from DBpedia ontology,
> more precisely a meaning is a DBpedia class. For example :
>
> oll:ville_1
>
>     a oll:Lemma ;
>     oll:hasMeaning dbonto:City .
>
> Unfortunatelly when I try my ontology with Protégé, it told me this instance
> is an error. The property "oll:hasMeaning" has a range which is "owl:Class".
>
> So my question is, is-it possible to do that ? If yes that come from
> certainly of a bug in Protégé, if no by which way I can define this ?
>
> Don't hesitate to ask if I was not clear enough.
>
> Thanks in advance for any help.
>
> Best.
>
> Julien.
Received on Monday, 3 March 2014 15:23:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:22:05 UTC