- From: Luca Matteis <lmatteis@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:23:41 +0200
- To: Bonnie MacKellar <mackellb@stjohns.edu>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3 org (public-lod@w3.org)" <public-lod@w3.org>
Have you looked at this: http://linkedct.org/ ? There seem to be lots of different URIs for the same resource define by Bio2RDF, LLD and LinkedCT so I'd choose the provider with most up-to-date results. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Bonnie MacKellar <mackellb@stjohns.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I notice that several datasets I am interested in appear both on the Bio2RDF > and Linked Life Data platforms. I want to integrate some of the data > contained in these data sets for an application. Is there an advantage to > using one platform over the other? Do they both provide dumps of the > triples? Are they up to date (for example, both contain clinical trial data, > which should be up to date to be useful).? I have spent some amount of time > searching for written comparisons and am coming up with nothing. Sorry if > this is an elementary question, but I am just digging into this right now. > > > > Thanks, > > Bonnie MacKellar > > mackellb@stjohns.edu > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 21:24:08 UTC