- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:29:05 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On 01/30/2014 09:10 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 1/30/14 1:09 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> >> >> If not bad, is there any provision for allowing that an HTTPS URI >> that only differs in the scheme part from HTTPS URI be identified >> as the same resource? >> >> >> http and https are fundamentally different resources, but you can link >> them together with owl : sameAs, I think ... > > Yes. > > You simply use an <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#sameAs> relation to > indicate that a common entity is denoted [1] by the http: and https: > scheme URIs in question. does it make sense then to use https: IRIs if we state that one can treat http: version as equivalent?
Received on Friday, 31 January 2014 11:29:14 UTC