- From: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 19:22:48 +0000
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Maloney, Christopher (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]" <maloneyc@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
And of course I would be happy to host such triples at sameAs.org :-) (And maybe a separate store that was devoted only to such triples would be a useful idea?) Just send me them to tell me where they are… Best On 30 Jan 2014, at 18:09, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 29 January 2014 22:36, Maloney, Christopher (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] <maloneyc@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov> wrote: > Apologies if this topic has come up before (I feel certain that it has) but I've searched the archives and Googled, and can't find anything (maybe too many false positives). > > What are the current best practice recommendations regarding the use of HTTPS URIs for resources in RDF? Are they bad? > > No, they are good. We use them over at https://w3id.org/ (one of the reasons that was created) > > > If not bad, is there any provision for allowing that an HTTPS URI that only differs in the scheme part from HTTPS URI be identified as the same resource? > > http and https are fundamentally different resources, but you can link them together with owl : sameAs, I think ... > > > Thanks! > > Chris Maloney > NIH/NLM/NCBI (Contractor) > Building 45, 5AN.24D-22 > 301-594-2842 > > > > > -- Hugh Glaser 20 Portchester Rise Eastleigh SO50 4QS Mobile: +44 75 9533 4155, Home: +44 23 8061 5652
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2014 19:23:15 UTC