- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:22:10 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org, Christian Bizer <chris@bizer.de>
- Message-ID: <53F1D3D2.7050809@csarven.ca>
On 2014-08-18 11:06, Christian Bizer wrote: > So we don’t plan to push a specific message with the diagram, but I > agree with you that the release of the diagram could be a good occasion > for the community to discuss the possible messages/conclusions that one > could draw from it and I would be happy if more people would comment on > this. Even if there is no explicit message, there is one due to the diagram's history. The current diagram that's about to be released is not a continuation of the 2011 diagram. However, it comes across as such, since the diagram has the same presentation. I am not making a case whether one or the other is more appropriate for the purpose it is trying to fulfil, but that there is a clear distinction between the information underneath and that deserves extra attention. > Personally, I think it is quite interesting to compare the deployment of > Microdata/RDFa/Microformats and Linked Data on the Web. We also > investigated the deployment of Microdata/RDFa/Microformats [1][2] and > the comparison currently looks like this: Why list RDFa along with Micro*? More importantly, why remove it from the other "first-class" Linked Data? > Thus, it makes sense that we see Linked Data adoption within communities > that have an interest in making their data easy to use and thus are > willing to invest effort into this, like libraries, government and > science (with life science and language processing being the first > communities adopting the technologies) and social networking. You do not truly believe that, do you? If you thought that Linked Data was a worthwhile effort, you would be delivering the research/science behind the updated diagram document as such in a machine-friendly manner. The question is, why are you not publishing your science using the available Linked Data stack? > This are my two cents to the overall discussion and I would be very > happy to hear what others think about the message that can be drawn from > the new diagram. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2014Jul/0143.html awaits your kind reply. -Sarven http://csarven.ca/#i
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 18 August 2014 10:22:41 UTC