Re: json ann

Perhaps a tiny confusion: JSON is different than JSON-LD. So no, JSON is
*not* becoming a W3C standard.

What is becoming a W3C standard is a way to use JSON to represent Linked
Data, that is, JSON-LD.

Cheers,
Luca


On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com
> wrote:

> Hi Paolo,
> It means that JSON-LD is working its way through the W3C Candidate
> Recommendation process now. [1]   My editorial - It is good news IMO that a
> bridge between the JSON developer community & Linking Open Data project has
> been forged.  I encourage you to read the CR doc & provide feedback.
>
> FYR:
> "This document was published by the RDF Working Group<http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/>as a Candidate Recommendation. This document is intended to become a
> W3C Recommendation. If you wish to make comments regarding this document,
> please send them to public-rdf-comments@w3.org (subscribe<public-rdf-comments-request@w3.org?subject=subscribe>,
> archives <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/>). W3Cpublishes a Candidate Recommendation to indicate that the document is
> believed to be stable and to encourage implementation by the developer
> community. This Candidate Recommendation is expected to advance to Proposed
> Recommendation no earlier than 01 October 2013. All comments are welcome."
>
> Cheers,
> Bernadette Hyland
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-json-ld-20130910/
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Greetings
>
> Lately was thinking,  at the back of my head would JSON ever become a W3C
> recommendation/standard , but I was not sure if it was a sensible thought.
>
> Today I came across this announcement
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2013/09/11/json-ld-feature-freeze-and-call-for-implementation/
>
> Could someone kindly comment/explain  what does thsi mean.if this could be
> a step toward JSON becoming a W3C standard,
>
> thank you
>
> PDM
>
> PDM
>
>
>