W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > September 2013

Re: SPARQL results in RDF

From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:08:03 -0400
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Message-Id: <A4D6690B-9416-49CB-8041-041C3279F8D2@w3.org>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>

1) I can see Hugh's frustration that the RDF system is incomplete
in a way.   You tell everyone you have a model which can
be used for anything and then make something which doesn't use it.
What's wrong with this picture?

Standardising/using/adopting http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/result-set
would solve that.

(The file actually defines terms like
without the ".n3")

2)   Different (I think) from what you want Hugh, but something I have thought would be handy would b a CONSTRUCT *  where it returns the sub graphs it matches as turtle, ideally without duplicates.   
This would be nice for lots of things, such as extracting a subset of a dataset.

CONSTRUCT * WHERE {  ?x name ?y; age ?a; ?p ?o.} FILTER { a > 18 }


On 2013-09 -23, at 07:03, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> DAWG did at one time work with result sets encoded in RDF for the testing work.
> As the WG progressed, it was clear that implementation of testing
> was based on result set comparison, and an impl needed to grok the XML results encoding anyway.  Hence the need for the RDF form dwindled but it's still there:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/result-set.n3
> Apache Jena will still produce it if you ask it nicely.
> 	Andy
Received on Monday, 23 September 2013 22:08:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:21:56 UTC