Re: representing hypermedia controls in RDF

I did see the presentation.  Apparently Dr. Hausenblas may have warned you about me too late :-)

My question can be rephrased thus:  Does the theoretical size of the  target audience for a distributed affordance matter ?  In IPv4, the target audience would be a "community" with a population of about 425.  In IPv6, probably much less than one (although I've not calculated it).  It seems to me that "distributed" entails that one size fits does not fit all clients, that constrains the Open World ... so, it would be very hard to tell if the concept and architecture are in operation.  Maybe TBL needs a 6th Star.
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 11/25/13, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote:

 Subject: Re: representing hypermedia controls in RDF
 To: "Gannon Dick" <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
 Cc: "public-lod Data" <public-lod@w3.org>
 Date: Monday, November 25, 2013, 4:05 PM
 
 Hi Gannon,
 
 > Are you thinking in terms of IPv4 or IPv6 ?
 
 I'm sorry but I lost you here… how can I IPv4/6 relate to
 this?
 
 Best,
 
 Ruben

Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 23:15:33 UTC