Re: representing hypermedia controls in RDF

Hi Kingsley,

>> In my talks, I say that enabling is stronger than affording.

> Do you have a link to the talk in question?

Well, it's something I always mention verbally, so "enabling" will not be on the slides.

Nevertheless, here's a presentation on it for a wide audience:
http://www.slideshare.net/RubenVerborgh/the-web-a-hypermedia-story
On slides 41–46, I explain Fielding's definition of hypermedia,
with slides 44–46 specifically focusing on "affordance".

And here are slides for my research project "Distributed Affordance" (what's in a name),
which explains the topic in a similar way on slides 7–18:
http://www.slideshare.net/RubenVerborgh/distributed-affordance-21175728

Affordance is in my opinion the crucial word that defines the REST architectural style,
as its loose conversational coupling is only possible because representations _afford_ subsequent actions;
RPC-style interactions just _enable_ those actions.

Best,

Ruben

Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 19:33:48 UTC