- From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 05:50:35 -0700
- To: "beyond-the-pdf@googlegroups.com" <beyond-the-pdf@googlegroups.com>
- CC: Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>, SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>
[I don't want to get into a debate, but I would like to clarify a few things] On 5/7/13 5:01 AM, "Pascal Christoph" <christoph@hbz-nrw.de> wrote: >Any "official standards body, government regulation" that would state >that "PDF >is as Web friendly as HTML and friends" is plainly misinforming. "Web Friendly" is a term that you are making up - it has no normative definition that anyone (except yourself) can base a discussion on. If you use the terms that are already defined and in use - Open Web or Open Web Platform - then PDF is very much a part of that. It meets 100% of the criteria. >PDF is maybe best for printing. It is not good for websites. I don't believe I ever stated that PDF should be used to build a (complete) website. I agree, that would be stupid. In the same vein, I wouldn't recommend building an entire site of JPEGs or PNGs, SVG or MathML - yet all of those are also technologies used as part of the Open Web. PDF can be used in the same way. >And considering the PDF feature of "loading the first site" (which is >still not streaming, btw.) being possible than more than 10 years: why is >this >not the standard when creating PDFs? That's a question you would need to ask the developer/vendor behind the PDF tools that you've chosen. Adobe's tools, for example, have had that option turned on (by default) for at least a decade - so every PDF produced using an Adobe product is "Fast Web Enabled". >Note, even if it were standard, it is >still not stream based. What is with all the unix processing tools? Using >PDF >is, at last, harder. As to the streaming point - (X)HTML isn't necessary streamable either. Depending on how the content is structured, the use of external references, scripts, etc. it may not be possible to process a given "web page" entirely in stream. This point is also one of the reasons why HTML isn't considered a document format, but instead is considered a content format. Document formats - PDF, ODF, OOXML, EPUB, etc. - all use a structured storage system that isn't designed to be processed as a stream in order to enable more complex (and random) access. Leonard
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 12:51:05 UTC