- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:30:37 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <514F464D.5040801@openlinksw.com>
On 3/24/13 2:18 PM, Sarven Capadisli wrote: > On 03/21/2013 03:46 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 3/20/13 7:36 AM, Sarven Capadisli wrote: >>> Dear community, >>> >>> I would like to know which venues (e.g., conferences, journals) are >>> out there that accepts research documents in >>> (X)HTML+CSS+JavaScript+MathML+SVG etc. as the primary and final >>> format. On that note, which accepts an HTTP URI of the research? >>> >>> As far as I know, there are none out there, but I want to be wrong >>> about this! >>> >>> What I'm hoping for are a bunch of things: >>> >>> Although not ultimately necessary, a venue to submit to that would >>> have some weight given "reviewed and approved" stamps. >>> >>> Not being at the mercy of classical publishers needs when it comes to >>> sharing knowledge given the technologies that we have at our disposal. >>> >>> In the absence of such forward-looking venues, I would love to see an >>> open discussion on what's really needed to make it happen and be it >>> the default approach when it comes to sharing research findings. >>> Pragmatic approaches are always welcome, so, this doesn't have to be >>> about "how to we make all scholarly publishing get on the Web?", but >>> rather for starters, "how do we make scholarly work of Linked Data and >>> Semantic Web researchers and practitioners get on the Web"? >>> >>> I don't mean to belittle or overlook the hard work that some groups >>> are already actively involved in e.g., Semantic Web Journal, Semantic >>> Web Dog Food, FORCE11. I'm merely looking for more out of this >>> community. >>> >>> For those that this sounds desirable, please voice yourself because >>> there are indeed many like you! >>> >>> Humbly yours, >>> >>> -Sarven >>> http://csarven.ca/#i >>> >> +1 >> >> Dog-fooding is important. Basically, exemplify what you seek from >> others. The more this is done the easier it will become for others to >> appreciate the virtues inherent in Linked Data and its underlying >> exploitation of Web Architecture. >> > > You already know how I share my work and try to encourage others to > give it a try to do the same. I don't think that's sufficient to win > this tough battle. > > SW/LD venues and supervisors are not on board. Obeying publisher's > demands and sticking to classical ways is the easy route. Why bother > right? Most of them neither bother to change or even encourage others > to take a forward step. > > If research venues simply accepted documents to be submitted using > native Web technologies, we'd see things changing hopefully in the > right direction (here is me with wishful thinking). > > They are keep using that [Linked Data] word, but I do not think it > means what they think it means. > > Perhaps the incentive to change needs to be worked on. > > -Sarven > Yes, and this also requires more work re. qualifying what Linked Data means . This is why I prefer to phrase "RDF based Linked Data" :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2013 18:30:59 UTC