- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:20:54 +0100
- To: Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@deri.org>
- Cc: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>, SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJCyKRp2s6h3D+QPDSqofWeH3zapPNmRzkaFk_jPcf2JKSJNvg@mail.gmail.com>
I don't know if it's exactly what Sarven wants but PeerJ (https://peerj.com) publishes great looking html based papers and with RDF metadata for all their papers. It's also open access. Thanks Paul On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Andrea Splendiani < andrea.splendiani@deri.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Cannot answer your first question, but I think the idea is worth exploring. > You would need a few things: > 1) A guarantee that the content at the page doesn't change without notice, > so that comments/judgements refer to the correct thing. You can use some > checksum-based method for this. > 2) Some consistent format and annotation, to facilitate search. Not only > from a computational perspective, we rely on some pattern > (abstract/methods/result) to quickly scan some artifact. So ok, we can have > some guidelines the research paper need to comply to (so we need a sort of > validator). > 3) Some guarantee of persistency. That could be supplemented by an > established archives that can resolve dead URLs.... > 4) A peer review sort of system, that in this case could be > post-publication, maybe coupled with some new metrics. > 5) A selection criteria could be useful as well. > > I'm sure you know: http://figshare.com. They store different things (not > executable), but no peer-review associated. > For executable content, beside Javacript&webby thing, it could make sense > to publish virtual machines these days. > > best, > Andrea > > > Il giorno 20/mar/2013, alle ore 11:36, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> > ha scritto: > > > Dear community, > > > > I would like to know which venues (e.g., conferences, journals) are out > there that accepts research documents in (X)HTML+CSS+JavaScript+MathML+SVG > etc. as the primary and final format. On that note, which accepts an HTTP > URI of the research? > > > > As far as I know, there are none out there, but I want to be wrong about > this! > > > > What I'm hoping for are a bunch of things: > > > > Although not ultimately necessary, a venue to submit to that would have > some weight given "reviewed and approved" stamps. > > > > Not being at the mercy of classical publishers needs when it comes to > sharing knowledge given the technologies that we have at our disposal. > > > > In the absence of such forward-looking venues, I would love to see an > open discussion on what's really needed to make it happen and be it the > default approach when it comes to sharing research findings. Pragmatic > approaches are always welcome, so, this doesn't have to be about "how to we > make all scholarly publishing get on the Web?", but rather for starters, > "how do we make scholarly work of Linked Data and Semantic Web researchers > and practitioners get on the Web"? > > > > I don't mean to belittle or overlook the hard work that some groups are > already actively involved in e.g., Semantic Web Journal, Semantic Web Dog > Food, FORCE11. I'm merely looking for more out of this community. > > > > For those that this sounds desirable, please voice yourself because > there are indeed many like you! > > > > Humbly yours, > > > > -Sarven > > http://csarven.ca/#i > > > > > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science - The Network Institute VU University Amsterdam
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 11:21:27 UTC