- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 23:29:36 +0100
- To: David Wood <prototypo@me.com>
- Cc: public-lod org <public-lod@w3.org>
On 12 July 2013 21:08, David Wood <prototypo@me.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone (Dan?) know whether the schema.org folks do or plan to support Linked Data referenced via <link rel="meta"> tags? The idea would be very similar to FOAF Autodiscovery [1]. > > I would think it would be quicker for the search engines to find and parse a dereferenceable Turtle file than to parse RDFa from HTML, but perhaps I'm mistaken. Generally schema.org has focussed on schemas, with a sideline in saying encouraging things about RDFa and JSON-LD. There has been a central emphasis on in-page markup mainly because of a suspicion of hidden markup. Search engines are on the receiving end of a lot of mischievous markup, and having structured data be part of human facing markup is a good strategy for keeping it relatively honest. That said JSON-LD also has a role to play (e.g. see https://developers.google.com/gmail/schemas/reference/formats/json-ld ) and there were some schema.org-related conversations around http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#embedding-json-ld-in-html-documents ... which can be considered a form of discovery. Regarding speed/details, what little I know is only relevant for Google. HTML pages are crawled anyway, for ordinary search purposes. I haven't heard anyone argue that Turtle is particularly needed, but in general I think you'd find more enthusiasm for a link-rel-based discovery mechanism compared to HTTP content negotiation or HTTP 303 redirects. JSON-LD does cover some of the same use cases as Turtle. But there are places where Turtle is useful, e.g. https://developers.google.com/freebase/data#data-format ... I'm not sure it's strengths are in the mass market 'everyday webmaster' world, though. And the fact that Turtle and SPARQL are so close makes Turtle a great language for documenting and displaying triples in a lossless and reasonably human friendly way. On the original question, it might be worth documenting a few other deployment routes, e.g. relationship to sitemaps, rss/atom feeds etc. Dan
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 22:30:03 UTC