- From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 20:30:06 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Incidentally, to clarify, I meant to ask a more fundamental question about mappings: are these creative works, deserving themselves of a CC license, or executable code, deserving of a code license? Whichever way, I'd like to make them as encumbered as possible. Barry On 12/07/13 13:20, Barry Norton wrote: > > I'd like to publicly release R2RML mappings for the MusicBrainz > dataset. DBpedia has shown interest in including the subset that can > be used to create a linkset. > > Any idea what (kind of) licence could/should apply? (To be clear, to > the mappings, as opposed to the dataset) > > I'd also like to attach, since R2RML is RDF, a licence and attribution > on a per rr:TriplesMap basis. (The mappings are hosted on github and > contributions will be accepted as I'm never going to get through all > of the MB Advanced Relationships, a moving target, myself and I'm > being a bottleneck.) > > The question's also been raised on whether a given licence can in turn > impose conditions on the triples that are created using it (as > derivative works)? Does that sound feasible? > > Any input appreciated. > > Barry >
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 19:30:29 UTC