Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [ANN] Add your links to DBpedia workflow version 0.1 (this is also an RFC)

Why not duck or why not just do it ? :-)

-1 to Hugh for making me explain my +1 to Kingsley.

+++++++
OWL Class, Property and SKOS describe "particles" of meta data with the presumption of fine structure because everybody knows atoms have fine structure.  This is a case where going with "what everybody knows" can be dangerous because you can compare atoms, but you can't collect all the Higgs Bosons in one place, call it a center of mass*, and ignore the other bits.

DBpedia won't make a *new* mistake, but it might not please content providers in search of relationship validation.

So, +1, but be ready to duck.

--Gannon

* or Capital, Hub, Destination, Truth, the only important stuff, etc.     






________________________________
 From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
To: public-lod@w3.org 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [ANN] Add your links to DBpedia workflow    version 0.1 (this is also an RFC)
 
On 1/29/13 11:12 AM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
> Also, what about owl:equivalentClass ?
> and even owl:equivalentProperty ?
> If you are having skos:closeMatch, then these seem close enough.
>
> I have a feeling I should probably duck now.
+1

Why not?

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen    
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen