- From: Jürgen Jakobitsch <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:57:26 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, Virtuoso Users <virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net>, "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
+1 to a best practice guide i was also unaware of the "Link" response header until today. came across it as of this morning in connection with powder [1]. wkr http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-primer-20080815/#publish On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 15:09 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > All, > > Over the years there has been a subtle "blind spot" re. Linked Data that > ultimately leads to many a debate thread about Linked Data utility and > applications etc.. Thus, I would like to outline a few simple best > practices that would go a long way to putting these reoccurring issues > to rest, once and for all. > > Whenever you publish an (X)HTML based Linked Data interface please try > to achieve at least one of the following: > > 1. Use Linked Data URIs in @href attribute of the <a/> tag associated > with the literal values that typically label the subject, predicate, or > object of an RDF triple. > 2. Use the <link/> tag's @rel attribute to associate the (X)HTML > document with Linked Data URIs of entities it describes or simply > mentions (casually or topically). > 3. If you have server access and admin level privileges, repeat #2 on > the server side using the "Link:" header in HTTP responses . > > Irrespective of how subjectively beautiful or ugly an (X)HTML interface > might be re., Linked Data display, the utility of your Linked Data is > ultimately comprised if it cannot be discovered, shared, and easily > referenced to by other Linked Data tools. > > Remember, this is all about webby structured data that leverages the RDF > data model -- an entity relationship model endowed with explicit machine > (and human) comprehensible entity relationship semantics :-) > > Here's a simple example from DBpedia: http://bit.ly/10wXsXF . > -- | Jürgen Jakobitsch, | Software Developer | Semantic Web Company GmbH | Mariahilfer Straße 70 / Neubaugasse 1, Top 8 | A - 1070 Wien, Austria | Mob +43 676 62 12 710 | Fax +43.1.402 12 35 - 22 COMPANY INFORMATION | web : http://www.semantic-web.at/ | foaf : http://company.semantic-web.at/person/juergen_jakobitsch PERSONAL INFORMATION | web : http://www.turnguard.com | foaf : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard | g+ : https://plus.google.com/111233759991616358206/posts | skype : jakobitsch-punkt | xmlns:tg = "http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard#"
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 20:57:52 UTC