- From: Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:40:47 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHM_hUNr=kG=E+K_+1SKGSU3ANpMdfNTpXkMw3aQgAukVBXDfw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Everyone, I am on of the developers at the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics for uniprot.org. We have for a while now a sparql endpoint in beta. beta.sparql.uniprot.org. I am trying to generate a Service Description for that endpoint that is as useful as possible and I have some questions. The first questions is about the uri of a named graph in an endpoint. Taking the following extracted example. I have a named graph in the endpoint. Is it correct to use the same uri for both the concept of the named graph and the name of the named graph? @prefix : <http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description#> @prefix void: <http://rdfs.org/ns/void#> . <http://purl.uniprot.org/tissues/> :graph <#_3> . :name <http://purl.uniprot.org/tissues/> . <#_3> void:classes "1" ; void:datadump <ftp://ftp.uniprot.org/pub/databases/uniprot/current_release/tissues.rdf.gz> ; void:distinctObjects "3560" ; void:distinctSubjects "1872" ; void:triples "6108"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#long> ; a :Graph ; :name <http://purl.uniprot.org/tissues/> . Or should the first part be <#_2> :graph <#_3> . :name <http://purl.uniprot.org/tissues/> . I also have a question about declaring the entailment regime. If no reasoning was applied, should an entailment regime be declared? if yes which one? If only owl:sameAs reasoning as done by OWLIM is used which entailment regime URI should I use? The last question is: in the attached example files, which properties are you missing i.e. you think would generally be useful? Regards, Jerven -- Jerven Bolleman me@jerven.eu
Attachments
- text/xml attachment: serviceDescription.rdf
- application/octet-stream attachment: serviceDescription.ttl
Received on Monday, 14 January 2013 15:41:49 UTC