- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:16:13 +0000
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
This issue comes up more than one would hope. Ivan Herman's work on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ is one answer (as Tim has pointed out) and dcterms:format doesn't quite cover it. When working on ADMS we had to come up with a new Class and property pair. See http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#adms:representationTechnique (ADMS is under development in the W3C Gov Linked Data WG but is already being used by various public sector bodies). HTH Phil. On 03/01/2013 11:55, Tim Haynes wrote: > On 01/02/2013 10:59 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> Was wondering if anyone knew of a predicate that could be used to define >> the data format in a document. >> >> It's not the MIME type, more a level of granularity within a mime type >> to represent certain evolutions of the project. >> >> I've looked at >> >> owl : versionInfo -- but that seems only to apply to ontologies >> doap : version -- but that seems to apply to projects >> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/doc#version -- seems to be the >> version of the document >> >> What I'm looking for is a string that say the data in the document is of >> a certain kind e.g. opensocial v0.1 vs opensocial v0.2 >> >> I know RDF should be perfectly self descriptive, but this will give the >> processor a hint as to what it will find, any bugs etc. > > How about > http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=terms#MediaType > or > something in http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ > ? > > HTH, > > ~Tim -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment See you at the Transatlantic Research on Policy Modelling Workshop January 28 - 29 2013, Washington DC Details at http://www.crossover-project.eu/workshop.aspx http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2013 12:16:42 UTC