- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:22:12 -0500
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <512E7904.1050905@openlinksw.com>
On 2/27/13 3:58 PM, Luca Matteis wrote: > Hello all, > > At http://www.cropontology.org/ I'm trying to make things a little > more RDF friendly. For example, we have an ontology about Groundnut > here: http://www.cropontology.org/ontology/CO_337/Groundnut/ttl > > I'm generating this from a somewhat flat list of names/concepts, so > it's still a work in progress. But I'm having issues making sense of > it all so that the ontology can be used by people that actually have > Groundnut data. > > For example, in that Turtle dump, search for "Canopy height". This is > a concept that people might use to describe the height of the canopy > of their groundnut plant, as the comment describes (this should be a > Property not a Class, but like I said, it's still work-in-progress). > Let's try with some sample data someone might have about groundnut, > and see if I can further explain my issue (I assume co: is a prefix > for my cropontology.org <http://cropontology.org> site, also the URIs > are different but it's just an example): > > :groundnut1 > a co:Groundnut; > co:canopyHeight xxx . > > Ok here's the issue, we know that `canopyHeight` is measured using > different methodologies. For example it might be measured using a > methodology that we found to be described as "Measuring the distance > from the base to the tip of the main stem", but it might also be some > other method. And, funny enough, we also realized that it is measured > using centimeters, with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 10cm. > > So how should I make this easier on the people that are using my > ontology? Should it be: > > :groundnut1 > a co:Groundnut; > co:canopyHeight "9.5cm" . > > or should it be: > > :groundnut1 > a co:Groundnut; > co:canopyHeight [ > co:method "Measuring the distance from the base to the tip of > the main stem"; > co:scale "9.5cm" > ] . > > Maybe I'm going about this the wrong way and should think more about > how this ontology is going to be used by people that have data about > it... but I'm not sure. Any advice would be great. And here's the > actual browsable list of concepts, in a tree sort of interface: > http://www.cropontology.org/terms/CO_337:0000039/ > > As you can see there's this kind of thing happening all over the > ontology where we have the Property->the method it was measured-> and > finally the scale. Any help? Thanks! > Some options that cover units of measurement: 1. http://www.linkedmodel.org/catalog/qudt/1.1/index.html . 2. http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1.html#hasCurrency -- its currency, but you should get the gist. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 21:22:36 UTC