- From: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:01:43 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Thank you Martynas, that seems to be just what I was looking for! Frans On 21-2-2013 13:54, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > Hey Frans, > > Dublin Core Terms has some general properties for this: > dct:hasPart http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-hasPart > dct:isPartOf http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-isPartOf > > Martynas > graphity.org > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Frans Knibbe | Geodan > <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to express a composition relationship. Something like: >> A Country consist of Provinces >> A Province consists of Municipalities >> >> I thought this should be straightforward because this is a common and >> logical kind of relationship, but I could not find a vocabulary which allows >> be to make this kind of statement. Perhaps I am bad at searching, or maybe I >> did not use the right words. >> >> I did find this document: >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SimplePartWhole/ ("Simple >> part-whole relations in OWL Ontologies"). It explains that OWL has no direct >> support for this kind of relationship and it goes on to give examples on how >> one can create ontologies that do support the relationship in one way or the >> other. >> >> Is there a ready to use ontology/vocabulary out there that can help me >> express containment/composition? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Frans >> >>
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 13:02:17 UTC